Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than the Galaxy C7's 77.7 overall score. The Galaxy S10 5G design is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy C7. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a larger screen and a greater display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture for better low-light images and a way higher video definition. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.