Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7, getting an 81 score against 77.7. Galaxy XCover Pro is a much newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C7, but it's notably heavier and thicker. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a little bit larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C7, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy C7. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy XCover Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.