Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Galaxy C7, with an 88.5 score against 77.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much newer than the Galaxy C7, it is a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a little bit greater count of pixels per inch of display, a larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a battery duration that is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy C7.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.