Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy C7's overall score of 77.7. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy C7, it's a little thicker and a little bit heavier. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a larger screen, a just a bit greater pixels amount in each display inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and a much better (4K) video resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a battery life that is just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy C7.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.