Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C7's global score of 77.7. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a newer phone than Galaxy C7, although it is extremely thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bigger display and a quite better screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a back camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy C7, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.