Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C7's 77.7 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy C7's, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy C7, because it has a larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy C7. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy C7, because it has a back camera with lot more MP, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy C7, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.