Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-17 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.23 x 2.61 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super PLS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Core LTE's 61.4 score. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Core LTE has Android 4.2.2 version. Galaxy A51 5G features a faster processor than Galaxy Core LTE, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a way greater display pixel density, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a way bigger display. The Galaxy A51 5G has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.