Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-17 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.23 x 2.61 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super PLS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy Core LTE, having a global score of 93.6 against 61.4. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Core LTE has Android 4.2.2 version. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much greater performance than Galaxy Core LTE, because it has 7 GB more RAM and 6 more CPU cores.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a lot better pixels density and a really bigger display. The Galaxy S10 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Core LTE, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a 114 percent larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Core LTE, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a lot better 12 mega-pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 5G is also the cheapest, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.