Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2022-03-22 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.97 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than the Galaxy F23, having a overall score of 85.3 against 84.6. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy F23 works with Android 12 OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a brighter screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a just a little higher pixel count in each inch in the display. Galaxy F23 has a very superior storage to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy F23 features better battery life than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, although it has a much less MP resolution back camera, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.