Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.13 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy F23, having a score of 87.1 against 84.6. The iPhone 8 Plus has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density.
IPhone 8 Plus has a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 8 Plus captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
The iPhone 8 Plus has much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy F23, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy F23 features a really longer battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.