Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F23, having an 88.1 score against 84.6. The iPhone X has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a just a bit higher number of pixels per inch of display.
IPhone X features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F23, because it has more internal memory. The iPhone X counts with a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera with a way worse resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Galaxy F23 features a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.