Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, having an 84.6 score against 82. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has less processing cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XR counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a lot lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the display. The iPhone XR shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy F23 has a much longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 70 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.