Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.24 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is a bit better than Apple iPhone XS, with an 84.6 score against 84.2. The Galaxy F23 is a incredibly newer and notably lighter cellphone than Apple iPhone XS, but it's just a little thicker. The iPhone XS features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The Galaxy F23 has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone XS has a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2659mAh. The Apple iPhone XS shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.