Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.49 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 global score. Even though Galaxy F23 is a bit thicker than the Google Pixel 3 XL, it's much lighter and also incredibly newer. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Galaxy F23 has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy F23. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.