Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has an overall score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has newer 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Samsung Galaxy F23 is a newer phone, and it is also way lighter and thinner than HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 features a better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
HTC One M9 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an extra graphics processing unit. The HTC One M9 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in low-light environments and a way less mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy F23 has a much longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.