Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.71 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is just a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, having a score of 84.6 against 81. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has the previous 12 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy F23's body is a lot newer and way lighter than LG G7 ThinQ's, although it's just a bit thicker.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a sharper screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater screen pixels density. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy F23. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
LG G7 ThinQ takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a way lower 16 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments. The LG G7 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy F23 has a superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.