Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is a bit better than the LG V10, getting an 84.6 score against 78.6. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has a newer 12 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with some nice extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy F23 is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also much lighter and just a little thinner than the LG V10.
The Galaxy F23 features a better performing CPU than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy F23 also has a higher number of cores. LG V10 features a sharper screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels count per inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
LG V10 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture. The LG V10 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a much better battery performance than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.