Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has a score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. Although Galaxy F23 is somewhat thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's a lot lighter and noticeably newer. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy F23, because although it has a back camera with a way worse 16 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy F23 features a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.