Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has an overall score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's score of 81.2. Galaxy F23's design is newer and notably lighter, but just a bit thicker than LG V40 ThinQ. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F23 has newer 12 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, providing some extra features and performance optimizations.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better screen pixels density.
LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy F23 has a much longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.