Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy F23's general score of 84.6. The LG Velvet has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has more RAM. LG Velvet and Samsung Galaxy F23 feature very similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
LG Velvet captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. LG Velvet features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 features improved battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.