Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom, with a general score of 84.6 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy F23 is a a lot newer phone, and it is also way lighter and just a little bit thinner than Motorola One Zoom. The Galaxy F23 has a slightly better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels and a quite larger display.
The Motorola One Zoom features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has an external SD slot that holds up to 128 GB. Galaxy F23 counts with a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola One Zoom takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a back camera with a lower 48 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments. The Galaxy F23 has improved battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.