Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy F23's 84.6 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy F23 has Android 12 version. The Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels, a little greater pixel density and a quite larger screen. Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy F23, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy F23 counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.