Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A50, having a overall score of 84.6 against 83.8. Galaxy F23 is a way newer and much lighter phone than Galaxy A50, but it is just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a screen that is very similar to the Galaxy F23 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels number per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F23. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A50 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy F23, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy F23 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.