Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-03-22 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy F23, getting an 86.6 score against 84.6. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy F23 has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little better processing power than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50s and Galaxy F23 both feature similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50s has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos and a lesser mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy F23 features improved battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.