Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than the Galaxy F23, getting an 85.5 score against 84.6. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy F23 has Android 12 version. Galaxy A51 features a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy F23's screen, because although the Galaxy A51 has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A51 features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy F23. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy F23 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a way better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a back camera with lesser megapixels and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and/or video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.