Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is slightly better than the Galaxy F23, having a 90.7 score against 84.6. Galaxy A52 is a noticeably heavier cellphone than Galaxy F23, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy F23, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy F23, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a way better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy F23 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.