Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F23, having a overall score of 91.3 against 84.6. The Galaxy A52 5G is a noticeably heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy F23, but both are 0.33inches thick. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 12 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little faster CPU than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a display that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy F23, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F23 counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.