Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F23, getting a 91.1 score against 84.6. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy F23 has Android 12. Galaxy A52s is a notably heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy F23, but they are equally thin.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s counts with a screen that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy F23, because although the Galaxy A52s has a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel number per inch of screen.
Galaxy A52s counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F23 features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.