Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy F23's overall score of 84.6. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has older 11 version and Galaxy F23 has Android 12. The Galaxy F23 has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2408 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A71 counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy F23 has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy A71 has a lot better camera than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.