Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than the Galaxy F23's general score of 84.6. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Galaxy F23 has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy F23, because it has a little bit better pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little bigger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy F23 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.