Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has a global score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's overall score of 79.3. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F23 has 12 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. The Galaxy F23 construction is noticeably newer and extremely lighter than the Galaxy Note 5's, although it's just a little thicker.
Samsung Galaxy F23 features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy F23 also has more CPU cores. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Galaxy F23 has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Note 5 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and a lot less megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy F23 has a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.