Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is just a bit better than Galaxy F23, getting a overall score of 86.2 against 84.6. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version while Galaxy F23 has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite and Galaxy F23 feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit worse screen pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit bigger display. Galaxy Note10 Lite takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a camera with a much lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy F23 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.