Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note5, with an 84.6 score against 80.2. Galaxy F23's design is a lot newer and much lighter, but also a bit thicker than the Galaxy Note5. Galaxy Note5's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy F23, both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note5 features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels number per display inch. Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy F23 features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Note5 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, although it has a camera with a way worse resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.