Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is a little bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport, with an 84.6 score against 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy F23 has 12 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Galaxy F23 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also extremely lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a better screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels amount in each screen inch. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has lesser RAM and 4 less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a GPU.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos. The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.