Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is slightly better than the Galaxy S7, having an 84.6 score against 79.5. The Galaxy F23 construction is a lot newer and a lot lighter than Galaxy S7's, but it's also a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy F23 also has a higher number of 2200 megahertz cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy S7 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy F23 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.