Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S9, having an 84.6 score against 83.3. The Galaxy S9 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy F23. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy F23, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos. The Galaxy S9 counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.