Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a overall score of 84.6 against 81. The Samsung Galaxy F23 construction is notably newer, incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F23 has a newer 12 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, counting with some additional features and performance enhancements.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F23. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a display that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy F23's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels count per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a much worse 25 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy F23 features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.