Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has a global score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 global score. Galaxy F23's body is incredibly newer, a lot lighter and a lot thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has older 12 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each inch of screen. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy F23. Both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 400 GB. Galaxy F23 counts with a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.