Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| -- | 8.32 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is a little bit better than Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a score of 84.6 against 82.2. The Galaxy F23 body is newer, notably thinner and much lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. Xperia XZ2 Premium has a way better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution and a way greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 400 GB. Xperia XZ2 Premium has just a little better processing power than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has more RAM memory.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.