Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 5.64 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has an overall score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the Xperia Z4v's 78.8 general score. The Galaxy F23 design is extremely newer, just a bit thinner and much lighter than Xperia Z4v. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has a more recent 12 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, so it provides you lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy F23, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics co-processor. Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better display pixels density.
The Sony Xperia Z4v captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy F23, although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light environments. Galaxy F23 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy F23 has a much better battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.