Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-22 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.10 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Black, Blue and Purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9, getting an 84.6 score against 83.2. The Galaxy F23 design is way newer and much lighter than Xiaomi Mi 9's, although it's also a little bit thicker. The Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels count per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9 takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Mi 9's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Galaxy F23 one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage. Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.