Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-03-22 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting a global score of 84.6 against 82.7. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has a more recent 12 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy F23's construction is incredibly newer, much lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy F23, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy F23 has greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.