Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F23, getting a global score of 87.9 against 84.6. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy F23 has Android 12. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy F23 and the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro have quite similar storage for applications and games, both have equal internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels. The Galaxy F23 has a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.