Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy F23 design is newer and notably lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's, although it is just a little bit thicker.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features just a little better performance than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy F23, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a 0% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.