Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's overall score of 81.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F23 has a more recent 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy F23 is a newer cellphone, and it's also way lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
Galaxy F23 counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2408 resolution and a just a little more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better memory for applications and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Galaxy F23 have similar battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.