Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-22 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| Aqua Blue and Forest Green | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's global score of 79. Galaxy F23's construction is newer, just a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy F23 has newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy F23. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy F23 has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a lesser mega-pixels back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a battery life that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy F23's battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.