Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-10-16 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is just a bit better than Galaxy F41, getting an 85.3 score against 85.2. IPhone 11 Pro Max is an older and heavier cellphone than the Galaxy F41, but Apple managed to make it just a little thinner anyway. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy F41 counts with Android 11 operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a greater performance than Galaxy F41, because although it has 2 lesser cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has way more brightness, a little bigger display, a just a little better pixel number in each display inch and a slightly better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a superior camera than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 51% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.