Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy F41, getting a general score of 87.1 against 85.2. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus construction is thinner than Samsung Galaxy F41, although it's a little heavier and was released many years before. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F41, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, a little less pixels per inch in the display and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a brighter screen. Galaxy F41 captures much better pictures and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a back facing camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
IPhone 8 Plus features more storage for applications and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy F41 has a much better battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 123% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.