Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy F41's score of 85.2. The Apple iPhone X construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy F41, although it was released many years before. IPhone X features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F41, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone X counts with a bit better display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density, more brightness and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436. The iPhone X has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy F41 counts with a superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy F41 takes much better videos and photos than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.