Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has an overall score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Galaxy F41's design is notably newer than the Google Pixel's, although it's just a little thicker and extremely heavier. The Galaxy F41 has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy F41 features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cores. Galaxy F41 captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F41 also has a much better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
Galaxy F41 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.